![]() I had run some math back in the early 8th edition days, and was disappointed by the resilience of LRBT against the anti-tank weapons available at that time. ![]() For Astra Militarum, I'm expecting 1 max tank commander per detachment, as well as 1 max company commander.įor the Leman russ, apart from a malfunctioning order system, it is not a durable enough tank. It has appeared since the Tau codex (Shas'O commanders), and currently since 9th dropped, it is a trend. ![]() But if you look at what has been done to other codices, it is the way GW forces us in list building. True,we don't need this harsh of a limitation. Why LRBT don't have this rule as standard? The radio vox is in every kit of leman russ ! Why the hell tank commanders need to baby sit regulars by staying 6" of them to transmit orders ?Īpart from that, the LRBT chassis itself is not durable enough. Is that too difficult as a rule to write for GW ? Infantry has access to radio vox for increasing orders range. Instead of granting the tank commander a bonus BS, they should give him a tank ace trait, and also the ability to transmit orders, by a freaking RADIO VOX (like every tank since 2nd world war). Or simply ditch the tank commander entry from HQ's, and make it an upgrade of one tank in a squadron of 2-3 models, in heavy support (where it belongs).ĭoing so, there would not be more tank commanders than regular LRBT.Īstra Militarum is a shooting army of mostly BS 4+ models, it should stay that way. As for the tank commander prevalence over the regular LRBT, they may adjust the prices even more than the +5/-5 points we have seen in the munitorum field manual 2021. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |